Skip to main content

On-demand webinar coming soon...


On-demand webinar coming soon...

South Korea AI Basic Act

South Korea AI Basic Act is South Korea’s comprehensive AI regulation establishing transparency, safety, and risk management requirements for high‑impact and generative AI.


What Is South Korea AI Basic Act?

The South Korea AI Basic Act is a national law governing the development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence in South Korea. It establishes a legal framework for trustworthy AI, with specific obligations for high‑impact and generative AI systems. The Act applies to both domestic and foreign organizations whose AI affects the Korean market to support responsible AI innovation. 

Why South Korea AI Basic Act Matters

For organizations building or using AI, the South Korea AI Basic Act sets clear expectations for transparency, human oversight, and lifecycle risk management. It helps leaders align AI initiatives with regulatory requirements while maintaining trust with users and regulators. 

From a regulatory perspective, the Act is a cornerstone of South Korea AI regulation. It reflects a risk‑based approach similar to other global AI frameworks, like the EU AI Act, increasing compliance consistency for multinational organizations.

Failing to meet South Korea AI Basic Act requirements can increase enforcement exposure, operational disruption, and reputational risk, particularly for high‑impact or user‑facing AI systems.

How Compliance With the South Korea AI Basic Act Is Implemented in Practice

 

  • AI system scoping and classification: Organizations inventory AI use cases and determine whether systems qualify as high‑impact, generative, or general AI to apply the correct compliance controls from the outset. 
  • Risk and impact assessments: Teams conduct documented AI risk assessments before deployment, identifying potential impacts on safety, rights, and users, and recording mitigation measures across the AI lifecycle.
  • Transparency and user disclosures: Product and marketing teams implement clear in‑product notices, labels, or watermarks to inform users when they are interacting with AI or AI‑generated content. 
  • Human oversight and controls: For high‑impact AI, organizations establish human‑in‑the‑loop review, escalation paths, and override mechanisms to ensure accountable decision‑making.
  • Operational governance and evidence: Compliance teams maintain policies, logs, and incident reporting processes to demonstrate ongoing adherence to South Korea AI regulation and respond to regulator inquiries. 

 

Related Laws & Standards

How OneTrust Helps With South Korea AI Basic Act

OneTrust AI Governance helps organizations operationalize the South Korea AI Basic Act through configurable AI governance workflows, centralized risk assessments, and defensible documentation. Teams can track AI system inventory, evidence compliance, and demonstrate readiness for regulatory review with consistent user experiences. 
 

[Explore Solutions →] 

AI governance provides the policies and frameworks for managing AI systems, while AI accountability ensures those frameworks are followed and outcomes are auditable.

AI accountability is typically shared among data scientists, compliance teams, and leadership. The Chief AI Officer, Chief Data Officer, or Chief Privacy Officer often oversees accountability measures.

The EU AI Act requires documentation, oversight, and risk management processes—core elements of AI accountability—to ensure that high-risk AI systems are transparent, traceable, and compliant.


You May Also Like